Betekenis van:
work animal

work animal
Zelfstandig naamwoord
    • an animal trained for and used for heavy labor

    Hyperoniemen

    Hyponiemen


    Voorbeeldzinnen

    1. on financing the 2010 work programme on training in the field of food and feed safety, animal health and animal welfare in the framework of the ‘Better Training for Safer Food Programme’
    2. Training the animals is a most important aspect of husbandry, particularly in long-term studies. It has a dual advantage in providing the animal with an intellectual challenge and making work more rewarding for the care-giver.
    3. public relations work, promotion and advertising, in particular to draw attention to intrinsic features and advantages of Community products, notably the quality and safety of food, specific production methods, nutritional and health aspects, labelling, animal welfare and respect for the environment;
    4. A Community financial contribution, for the financing of the Second OIE Global Conference on Animal Welfare ‘Putting the OIE standards to work’, organised by the OIE in 2008, of EUR 200000 constituting a Community co-financing of at maximum 50 % of the total eligible costs is approved.
    5. The Community’s financial assistance shall be at the rate of 100 % of the eligible costs to be incurred by the Centro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal for the work programme and shall amount to a maximum of EUR 100000 for the period from 1 January to 31 December 2006.
    6. When the Commission considers, after consulting the crisis unit and in close collaboration with the Member States through the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, that the work of the crisis unit is completed because the risk has been brought under control, it may dissolve the crisis unit.
    7. The Community Emergency Veterinary Team should work, as appropriate, in close cooperation with other international expert groups, such as the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), and the World Health Organisation (WHO) in order to ensure that the available expertise are used in the most effective way,
    8. As the group will be consulted in particular on the Commission's programme of work, it will in practice be essential for it to embrace the representative bodies that are the most capable of protecting, at European level, general interests connected with the food chain and animal and plant health.
    9. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1754/2006 of 28 November 2006 laying down detailed rules for the granting of Community financial assistance to Community reference laboratories for feed and food and the animal health sector [3] provides that the financial assistance from the Community is to be granted if the approved work programmes are efficiently carried out and the beneficiaries supply all the necessary information within certain time limits.
    10. In developing the guidance, the Committee set up by Article 30 of Directive 2001/18/EC on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC has been consulted, and account has been taken of the work of the national competent authorities, the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and the Community Reference Laboratory.
    11. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1754/2006 of 28 November 2006 laying down detailed rules for the granting of Community financial assistance to Community reference laboratories for feed and food and the animal health sector [3] provides that the financial assistance from the Community is to be granted if the approved work programmes are efficiently carried out and that the beneficiaries supply all the necessary information within certain time limits.
    12. Article 16(2) of Directive 98/8/EC establishes a 10-year work programme, also commencing on 14 May 2000, during which all the active substances contained in biocidal products that were present on the market before that date are to be systematically examined and, if found acceptable from the point of view of human and animal health and the environment, are to be included in the positive list set out in that Directive.